The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is inching closer to one of the most significant legal challenges in Big Tech history:

The potential breakup of Google.

After a federal judge ruled in August that the search giant had monopolized the online search market, the DOJ began considering “behavioral and structural remedies” to curtail its dominance.
This could mean splitting up Google’s core businesses, echoing the seismic antitrust case against Microsoft in 1998.

But is this the right move?

At nearly 90% of all search queries passing through its platform, Google’s dominance is undeniable.
Exclusive agreements, like those with Apple, have allowed the company to keep competitors at bay while maintaining their self-established ad pricing.
The DOJ’s case, mirroring Microsoft’s historic battle, focuses on this monopoly and its effects on competition.

But it begs the question:

Is Google being punished for simply being better at what it does?
The DOJ is looking at two major avenues: behavioral restrictions (limiting default agreements and preinstallations) and structural remedies (divestitures of products like Chrome, Android, or Play Store).
The concern is that Google’s tight integration of services gives it an unfair advantage over competitors and potential newcomers.

But what do consumers think?

These remedies could break the user experience that consumers have come to expect.
By untangling these connections, the DOJ could create fragmentation that reduces efficiency and convenience for users.
And… maybe even stranger… might create a bunch of monopolies across multiple tools and technologies.

It’s not just search under scrutiny… it’s AI too.

Google’s heavy investment in AI could further entrench its dominance.
With tools like Gemini and AI-driven enhancements in Google Search, the company is well-positioned and leveraged to lead in the next wave of AI-powered technologies.
The DOJ fears that Google’s current market position will allow it to monopolize AI, preventing competition in an emerging industry.

Dismantling Google is a bold move, but it’s also a gamble.

The complexity of Google’s ecosystem means this is no simple breakup.
The immediate fallout could lead to chaos in the advertising and AI sectors.
For those in favor of fair competition, this might be the shake-up Big Tech needs to open the playing field.

How this unfolds will undoubtedly set the tone for future regulatory battles and the evolution of innovation as we know it.

This is what Elias Makos and I discussed on CJAD 800 AM. Listen in right here.

Before you go… ThinkersOne is a new way for organizations to buy bite-sized and personalized thought leadership video content (live and recorded) from the best Thinkers in the world. If you’re looking to add excitement and big smarts to your meetings, corporate events, company off-sites, “lunch & learns” and beyond, check it out.