If there’s one thing brands hate, it’s when customers attack using Social Media.
There’s no doubt that using Social Media and publishing your reasons for feeling wronged is not only commonplace, but something that usually gets results. While it may not be complete satisfaction on the customer’s side, usually an apology or an acknowledgement that things weren’t perfect from the brand is enough to tame the wildest of Twitter beasts. In the past little while, it has been a conversation that seems to be recurring with much more frequency in the Six Pixels of Separation world (just take a listen to my most recent Podcast with Joseph Jaffe: SPOS #222 – Jaffe And Joel #9 [Across The Sound 9.20] or read this Blog post: The White Noise That Is Twitter).
But, here’s what brands will never tell you…
On the surface, you’ll hear public statements like, "Social Media is an important place for us to listen to and react to our consumers," or, "even if we did something bad, it’s important that we’re accountable and that the general public sees our response." In the boardroom and behind closed corporate doors, many brands feel like ousted BP CEO, Tony Hayward, and his infamous, "I want my life back!" line. In short, they would love to see Social Media go away – especially the brands/industries that always struggle with customers and satisfaction. In a perfect world, they’d prefer if all of the flubs, foibles and inferior service wasn’t publicly broadcasted for all to see, search and comment on.
Now, they’re doing it to themselves.
A new trend is that certain brands consider all tweets, Blog posts, etc… as a public record and have corporate policies around responding (in short order) to any concerns or complaints in the many online channels. What brands fail to realize is that this opens the floodgates, and is now pushing individuals who would normally not make customer services complaints publicly, to do so.
Think about that. Think about this…
Just this week I had two customer services incidents that I’ll share with you…
I could go postal. I could go tweeting.
In both instances, I have intimate knowledge of these two companies and know that they both respond to issues immediately online, but I chose not to. Why?
So, how does one get resolution?
It’s crazy, isn’t it? By working the traditional channels and trying to keep things private, nothing happens. Nothing gets resolved and the brands don’t even realize/know these issues are taking place. If I tweet about it (which I don’t want to do), there is a strong possibility I would get next-to-perfect resolution and the brand would then be able to iterate and evolve based on the incident. They’re, literally, begging me to go public.
Does anyone else see the strange irony here? Brands are now forcing their customers to attack in public! Anyone else find that a little crazy?
How safe is your fitness tracker? Strava, the fitness app beloved by runners and cyclists…
Episode #956 of Six Pixels of Separation - The ThinkersOne Podcast is now live and…
Welcome to episode #956 of Six Pixels of Separation - The ThinkersOne Podcast. Ravin Jesuthasan…
Is there one link, story, picture or thought that you saw online this week that…
Can technology end the contentious debate over immigration? In the province of Quebec, the Parti…
Episode #955 of Six Pixels of Separation - The ThinkersOne Podcast is now live and…
This website uses cookies.